Wednesday, May 23, 2018 |
Column: Family Briefing —
Topic: Feminism —
In Harm's Way
Why Are Women Marching to Their Own Hurt?
by Nicole M. King
March 8, 2017, was "International Women's Day," and media outlets hailed the event's observation worldwide. A march in Buenos Aires, a fake glass ceiling in Tbilisi, Georgia, workplace strikes in France—these events and others made up the global celebration of "women's equality and empowerment," as the New York Times called it.
The celebrants' focus was a bit different in each country. In France, women were urged to leave work at 3:40 p.m.—women are purportedly paid, on average, 26 percent less than men, so 3:40 marks the time in a typical workday when women start working for nothing. In Ireland, women wore black to protest their country's conservative stance on abortion. In Buenos Aires, the women's march focused on violence against women—CNN cited a statistic alleging that "a woman is killed in Argentina every 30 hours because of her gender."
"I am woman, hear me roar" describes the overall tenor of the day. Women everywhere were standing up against the fact that they earn less than men, have fewer opportunities than men, and are oppressed, abused, beaten, enslaved, and even killed by men. But while in many places, and in particular instances, these things certainly do happen, as generalities they fall flat.
Feminism versus Facts
What the women marching on International Women's Day didn't seem to know is the fact that married women are safer on almost all fronts than unmarried women. A report by the Heritage Foundation found that in America, married women with children suffer far less (half the rate) from both domestic abuse and violent crime than do single mothers.1 In China, researchers discovered that women who were cohabiting were more than twice as likely as married women to experience intimate partner violence, and their injuries were far more severe.2 The U.S. Department of Justice has consistently found that both men and women who are married suffer far less from violent crime than do the unmarried.3
There are many other ways in which it can be shown that the very things that feminists protest and march in favor of are the things that harm women. D. Paul Sullins at the Catholic University of America has found, for example, "a remarkably consistent" linkage between "the elevated risk of mental disorders" and having undergone an abortion. (He also found that, just as abortion is associated with decreased mental health, so live birth is consistently associated with better mental health.)4 And a recent, huge study of over one million women in Denmark discovered a significant linkage between the use of hormonal contraception (the pill, patch, shot, IUD, etc.) and an increased incidence of mental health disorders.5
There is yet more. Feminists want women in the workplace, but studies and surveys have repeatedly found that women who stay home with their children, or who work part-time while their children are small, report themselves happier than those who work full-time. Feminists want women to be independent from men—married if they wish, divorcing if the mood strikes them. But studies have consistently shown that both men and women who marry and stay married are happier, healthier, recover from illness better, and make more money than do their never-married and divorced or separated peers.
Complicit in Oppression
The "women are oppressed" narrative, seemingly espoused by most of the women (and feminist men) participating in International Women's Day, only goes so far. Yes, in some places, they are indeed oppressed. But marriage, childbearing, taking care of one's own children, staying off of hormonal contraception—all these things have been associated with less oppression and less unhappiness.
The feminist movement as a whole ignores this reality, and in doing so, is itself guilty of oppression. •
Notes 1. Pat Fagan, Kirk Johnson, and Robert Rector, "Marriage: Still the Safest Place for Women and Children," Backgrounder 1732 (Mar. 9, 2004): heritage.org/marriage-and-family/report/marriage-still-the-safest-place-women-and-children. 2. Janet Yuen-Ha Wong et al., "A Comparison of Intimate Partner Violence and Associated Physical Injuries Between Cohabiting and Married Women: A 5-Year Medical Chart Review," BMC Public Health 16 (2016): ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5129237. 3. Jennifer L. Truman and Lynn Langton, "Criminal Victimization, 2014," U.S. Department of Justice Bulletin (August 2015, revised Sept. 29, 2015), 6: bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv14.pdf. 4. "The New Research: Aborting Mental Health," The Family in America (Spring 2016): http://familyinamerica.org/newsletter/december-7-2016-censoring-pro-lifers-and-promoting-mental-breakdown-france. 5. Charlotte Wessel Skovlund et al.,"Association of Hormonal Contraception with Depression," JAMA Psychiatry 73.11 (2016), 1154-1162: http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/article-abstract/2552796.
Nicole M. King is the managing editor of the Howard Center's quarterly journal, The Family in America: A Journal of Public Policy.
More on Feminism from the Salvo online archives.
Column: Family Briefing — Salvo 41
Why Are Women Marching to Their Own Hurt? by Nicole M. King
Feature — Salvo 33
World War Sex
A Global Revolution Imperils Men, Women & Children by Benjamin J. Vail
Department: Parting Shot — Salvo 38
Slap in the Face
Feminism Turns Kindness into Oppression by Robin Phillips
YOU SHOULD SUBSCRIBE!
Salvo subscribers have full access to the online archives!
Salvo magazine unblushingly offers an honest, rational, and respectful perspective to hard questions about SCIENCE, SEX, and SOCIETY.
Full access to the Salvo online archives. Only $15.99.
Get 4 issues + full access to the online archives. Only $25.99.
Consider ordering a bulk subscription for a reading group or a small group!
The Current Issue—Spring 2018
A Salvo Fake Ad
Visit the blog of Salvo author Robin Phillips
Salvo 43—Winter 2017
A Boy's Life: 5 Recommendations for Shielding Our Sons from the Anti-Culture—And Setting Them Towards Manhood by Anthony Esolen
Optimal Optics: Evolutionists Don't Know a Good Eye When They See One by Jonathan Wells
Up for Grabs: In Science, When 'Anything Goes,' Everything Goes by Denyse O'Leary
Revolution 101: How the 'New Civics' Is Fomenting Civil Unrest by Terrell Clemmons
Salvo 42—Fall 2017
Engendered Confusion: The Chaos of Postmodern Sexuality by Laurie Higgins
Zombie Killer: The "Icons of Evolution" Have Joined the Ranks of the Undead by Denyse O'Leary
Mutant Destruction: Does Cancer Really Innovate? by Jonathan Wells
The Darwin Tales: It's Time to Remit Darwinian Storytelling to the Annals of History by Terrell Clemmons
Eye Openers: Eight Common Factors for Atheists Changing Their Minds About God by Matt Nelson
Tuning Out the Universe: How Naturalism & Post-Fact Science Ignore the Evidence We See by Denyse O'Leary
Improbably So: Fine-Tuning Is Unlikely, but Unlikely Things Happen All the Time by Tim Barnett
Deep-Seated Rights: What They Are & Why You Have Them by Steve Jones
The Long Red Shadow: Mike Shotwell Has a Message for Millennial America by Terrell Clemmons
Taking Polls Apart: Human Complexity Foils Electoral Predictions by Denyse O'Leary
Champ Change: Darwinism's Rumble in the Jungle by Regis Nicoll
Morality as Story: The False Charity of Modern Journalism by Rebekah Curtis
4 issues of Salvo PLUS full access to the online archives!
• Give a Gift Sub
• Manage Sub Account
• About Salvo
• The Fake Ads
• Login for Full Access
• Touchstone Magazine
• The Fellowship of St. James
All material Ⓒ 2017. Salvo is published by The Fellowship of St. James.