Thursday, September 20, 2018 | site map | contact | FSJ

Subscribe to Salvo magazine today! Take a look at an issue online and if you like what you see, SUBSCRIBE at a discounted rate.

You Can Be Part of Salvo By Supporting Its Mission Today

We depend on all our great readers to keep Salvo going!

Follow Salvo online

Join Our Email List
Enter your email below:

Further Reading


Weekly Salvo

December 7, 2015

Playing God

Last week scientists from the U.S., Britain and China gathered in Washington, D.C. to discuss how to regulate genetic engineering, specifically, the CRISPR technique.

Here's how The Washington Post explains what that is: "Developed only in the past four years, the CRISPR [clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats] technique exploits a natural process used by ordinary bacteria to defend against invasive viruses. It enables rank-and-file scientists – just about anyone with a modern laboratory and the right skills – to alter genes within plants and animals and make those changes heritable."

"Heritable" being the key word, as this type of gene editing "tinkers[s] with the human genome in a way that is passed down to future generations." And many scientists have grave concerns about the implications of that.

The International Summit on Human Gene-Editing said that it would be "irresponsible to proceed with any clinical use of germline editing' until the risks were better understood. Among the risks, according to BioEdge, are "the fact that, once introduced into the human population, genetic alterations would be difficult to remove and would not remain within any single community or country," and "the difficulty of predicting harmful effects that genetic changes may have under the wide range of circumstances experienced by the human population…"

But despite the concerns and the risks, the summit ended without endorsing a moratorium.

More on this topic from Salvo:

Read more about the CRISPR technique and the ethical concerns it raises in "Genetic Restraint: Things That Simply Should Not Be Done by Paige Comstock Cunningham."

Copy That? Where Is the Great Cloning Debate? by Paige Comstock Cunningham

Double Features: Hollywood's inconsistent take on cloning by Raymond J. Keating

Recieve Weekly Salvos in your inbox

Subscribe to Salvo today!

If you enjoy Salvo, please consider giving an online donation! Thanks for your continued support.


A Boy's Life: 5 Recommendations for Shielding Our Sons from the Anti-Culture—And Setting Them Towards Manhood by Anthony Esolen

Revolution 101: How the 'New Civics' Is Fomenting Civil Unrest by Terrell Clemmons

Up for Grabs: In Science, When 'Anything Goes,' Everything Goes by Denyse O'Leary

Optimal Optics: Evolutionists Don't Know a Good Eye When They See One by Jonathan Wells


The Darwin Tales: It's Time to Remit Darwinian Storytelling to the Annals of History by Terrell Clemmons

Engendered Confusion: The Chaos of Postmodern Sexuality by Laurie Higgins

Zombie Killer: The "Icons of Evolution" Have Joined the Ranks of the Undead by Denyse O'Leary

My Favorite Zombies: Can We Let Them Rest in Peace? by James M. Kushiner

Eye Openers: Eight Common Factors for Atheists Changing Their Minds About God by Matt Nelson

Tuning Out the Universe: How Naturalism & Post-Fact Science Ignore the Evidence We See by Denyse O'Leary

Deep-Seated Rights: What They Are & Why You Have Them by Steve Jones

Improbably So: Fine-Tuning Is Unlikely, but Unlikely Things Happen All the Time by Tim Barnett

The Long Red Shadow: Mike Shotwell Has a Message for Millennial America by Terrell Clemmons

The Good Life: It's to Know, Serve & Love the Truth, Not the Pursuit of Happiness by James Altena

Taking Polls Apart: Human Complexity Foils Electoral Predictions by Denyse O'Leary

Morality as Story: The False Charity of Modern Journalism by Rebekah Curtis

Can We Talk?: It Is Crucial That We Put Our Minds to Contentious Issues by James M. Kushiner

© 2018 Salvo magazine. Published by The Fellowship of St. James. All rights reserved. Returns, refunds, and privacy policy.